6th post

I really liked this article because this style of drawing did not represent a romantic style, but rather a comical purpose of drawing. When I looked at Rube Goldberg's website, I loved his style because they were like concise comics. What I thought was interesting about Thomas Oakley's article was that it was almost the opposite of what regular teachers do when it comes to art. Most teachers only do art when they use it to solidify other subjects being taught in class, those deemed to be "more important" like math or science. However, Oakley is using regular subjects to have students perfect their methods of drawing.

Of all of the examples online, my favorite drawing by Goldberg is "Safety Device for Walking on Icy Pavements" (its the picture that I included on this blog). I think it is so funny because it has so many random aspects to it. The dog seems quite content while the man slipping is clearly in a state of distress. Also, I think it is quite comical that the pillow being dropped will clearly not be sufficient for the man because he is going to land on his butt way in front of the pillow.

5th post

In this article, Robin Vande Zande explores the ideas as to why people make aesthetic choices in their daily life. She begins the article claiming that aesthetic expressions can "hold attention and/or add emotional depth to an experience". In other words, it is each person's choice  how to represent themselves materialistically. Robin places this abstract idea in context for readers by drawing on historical fact. For example, the original assembly line was to produce cars, which was to make trading and transportation easier. Now, however, cars have all these added features based on size, speed, and gadgets that make them more appealing to different buyers. Car buyers are making aesthetic choices.

Similarly, everyone in our art class makes aesthetic choices. Just based on the fact that each person comes to class dressed differently shows some of their aesthetic choices. Also, each of us understands concepts and readings differently, which is why all of our class projects and responses look different and reflect different ideas. 

4th post

I do and don't like Amy Shultz's article at the same time. I think it brings up valid points, but are not always applicable like she says. In her article she addresses the issue of multiple intelligences. Specifically, she suggests that more visual learners should be allowed to create art in order to get their words out more fluidly. The question is then "to what extent are visual learners being adequately served by general education practices". I agree with this statement and think that multiple intelligences need to be better addressed; I was always a hands on learner, and even though I did well in school I constantly needed to go see teachers for one-on-one explanations after class.

However, what I don't necessarily agree with is that students should be made to produce works of art or drawings as a precursor to writing. I myself always found drawing a frustrating activity, so this process would only hinder my ability to write. However, I do think that it is a logical process, and should definitely be offered and encouraged to those that would benefit from it.

Just so you get an idea, the picture on the right represents how frustrated I get when I have to draw :/