I do and don't like Amy Shultz's article at the same time. I think it brings up valid points, but are not always applicable like she says. In her article she addresses the issue of multiple intelligences. Specifically, she suggests that more visual learners should be allowed to create art in order to get their words out more fluidly. The question is then "to what extent are visual learners being adequately served by general education practices". I agree with this statement and think that multiple intelligences need to be better addressed; I was always a hands on learner, and even though I did well in school I constantly needed to go see teachers for one-on-one explanations after class.
However, what I don't necessarily agree with is that students should be made to produce works of art or drawings as a precursor to writing. I myself always found drawing a frustrating activity, so this process would only hinder my ability to write. However, I do think that it is a logical process, and should definitely be offered and encouraged to those that would benefit from it.
Just so you get an idea, the picture on the right represents how frustrated I get when I have to draw :/
2 comments:
Stephanie...you're right in that not all students will find drawing helpful in sparking their writing. Teachers need to give students some choices in their expression of learning according to their strengths.
12 points
Stephanie...I sympathize with your frustration...I think what we as educators need to think about is offering choices to our students. Kids for whom drawing is beneficial to their writing should have the choice to do it, other kids may have different processes and those choices should be honored as well. Having said that, I think it's sometimes important to get students out of their comfort zones...as long as you set it up (as in drawing) so they aren't expected to produce a strong product. Eliminate the intimidation factor!
12 points
Post a Comment